CVE-2009-2335Not scoredCWE-16

CVE-2009-2335

Vendor not named in the CVE record

Fixed in 2.8.1 · Exploitation: likely to be exploited (10% or more)

Not in CyberSIXT coverage yet: no article names this CVE. This page shows the public record.

85.0%probability of exploitation in the next 30 days

99th percentile

050100

Higher than 99% of scored CVEs

Not scored yet. The CVE record carries no CVSS score.

DescriptionCVE.org

WordPress and WordPress MU before 2.8.1 exhibit different behavior for a failed login attempt depending on whether the user account exists, which allows remote attackers to enumerate valid usernames. NOTE: the vendor reportedly disputes the significance of this issue, indicating that the behavior exists for "user convenience."

On the Atlas

Every published CVE is on the CyberSIXT Atlas, grouped by weakness, vendor and month.

Open the Atlas

Exploitation: Likely to be exploited (10% or more). EPSS gives it a 10% or higher chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
CISA KEV: Not listed
Public check: No public nuclei template
Weakness: Configuration · Misconfiguration and Insecure Design
Published: July 2009
Band: Likely to be exploited (10% or more), July 2009

CoverageNo articles yet

No CyberSIXT article names CVE-2009-2335 yet, so there is no coverage timeline, action brief or change log for it. Everything on this page comes from the public CVE record, CISA KEV, EPSS and the nuclei template index. Search the archive or see the CVEs in the news.