CVE-2010-0420: Pidgin vulnerability
Fixed in 2.6.6 · Affected: Pidgin before 2.6.6 · Exploitation: possible (1 to 10%)
Not in CyberSIXT coverage yet: no article names this CVE. This page shows the public record.
Higher than 86% of scored CVEs
Not scored yet. The CVE record carries no CVSS score.
DescriptionCVE.org
libpurple in Finch in Pidgin before 2.6.6, when an XMPP multi-user chat (MUC) room is used, does not properly parse nicknames containing <br> sequences, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted nickname.
On the Atlas
Every published CVE is on the CyberSIXT Atlas, grouped by weakness, vendor and month.
- Exploitation
- Possible (1 to 10%). EPSS between 1% and 10%.
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Public check
- No public nuclei template
- Vendor
- Pidgin
- Published
- February 2010
CoverageNo articles yet
No CyberSIXT article names CVE-2010-0420 yet, so there is no coverage timeline, action brief or change log for it. Everything on this page comes from the public CVE record, CISA KEV, EPSS and the nuclei template index. Search the archive or see the CVEs in the news.
References
- NVD entrynvd.nist.gov
- CVE recordcve.org
- Weakness CWE-20cwe.mitre.org
- Vendor advisorylists.fedoraproject.org
- Vendor advisoryrhn.redhat.com
- Vendor advisorymandriva.com
- Vendor advisoryubuntu.com
- Vendor advisorylists.fedoraproject.org
- Vendor advisorylists.opensuse.org
- Vendor advisorylists.fedoraproject.org
- Vendor advisorydebian.org
- Vendor advisorymandriva.com
- securityfocus.com/bid/38294securityfocus.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565786bugzilla.redhat.com
- vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0413vupen.com
14 more references are in the CVE record.