CVE-2015-4000
Vendor not named in the CVE record
Vendor fix available · Exploitation: likely to be exploited (10% or more)
Not in CyberSIXT coverage yet: no article names this CVE. This page shows the public record.
Higher than 99% of scored CVEs
DescriptionCVE.org
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue.
On the Atlas
Every published CVE is on the CyberSIXT Atlas, grouped by weakness, vendor and month.
- Exploitation
- Likely to be exploited (10% or more). EPSS gives it a 10% or higher chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Public check
- No public nuclei template
- Published
- May 2015
CoverageNo articles yet
No CyberSIXT article names CVE-2015-4000 yet, so there is no coverage timeline, action brief or change log for it. Everything on this page comes from the public CVE record, CISA KEV, EPSS and the nuclei template index. Search the archive or see the CVEs in the news.
References
- NVD entrynvd.nist.gov
- CVE recordcve.org
- Weakness CWE-295cwe.mitre.org
- Vendor advisorylists.opensuse.org
- Vendor advisorylists.opensuse.org
- Vendor advisorymarc.info
- Vendor advisoryrhn.redhat.com
- Vendor advisorylists.opensuse.org
- Vendor advisorymarc.info
- Vendor advisorydebian.org
- Vendor advisorydebian.org
- Vendor advisorymarc.info
- Vendor advisorymarc.info
- Vendor advisorylists.opensuse.org
- Vendor advisorylists.opensuse.org
28 more references are in the CVE record.