CVE-2015-8923: Libarchive vulnerability
Fixed in 3.2.0 · Affected: Libarchive before 3.2.0 · Exploitation: possible (1 to 10%)
Not in CyberSIXT coverage yet: no article names this CVE. This page shows the public record.
Higher than 87% of scored CVEs
Not scored yet. The CVE record carries no CVSS score.
DescriptionCVE.org
The process_extra function in libarchive before 3.2.0 uses the size field and a signed number in an offset, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted zip file.
On the Atlas
Every published CVE is on the CyberSIXT Atlas, grouped by weakness, vendor and month.
- Exploitation
- Possible (1 to 10%). EPSS between 1% and 10%.
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Public check
- No public nuclei template
- Vendor
- Libarchive
- Published
- September 2016
CoverageNo articles yet
No CyberSIXT article names CVE-2015-8923 yet, so there is no coverage timeline, action brief or change log for it. Everything on this page comes from the public CVE record, CISA KEV, EPSS and the nuclei template index. Search the archive or see the CVEs in the news.
References
- NVD entrynvd.nist.gov
- CVE recordcve.org
- Weakness CWE-20cwe.mitre.org
- Vendor advisoryubuntu.com
- Vendor advisoryrhn.redhat.com
- Vendor advisorylists.opensuse.org
- Vendor advisorysecurity.gentoo.org
- Vendor advisorydebian.org
- blog.fuzzing-project.org/47-Many-invalid-memory-access-issues-inblog.fuzzing-project.org
- github.com/libarchive/libarchive/issues/514github.com
- oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjul2016-3090oracle.com
- securityfocus.com/bid/91309securityfocus.com
- Mailing listopenwall.com
- Mailing listopenwall.com