CVE-2019-11235
Vendor not named in the CVE record
Fixed in 3.0.19 · Exploitation: possible (1 to 10%)
Not in CyberSIXT coverage yet: no article names this CVE. This page shows the public record.
Higher than 89% of scored CVEs
Not scored yet. The CVE record carries no CVSS score.
DescriptionCVE.org
FreeRADIUS before 3.0.19 mishandles the "each participant verifies that the received scalar is within a range, and that the received group element is a valid point on the curve being used" protection mechanism, aka a "Dragonblood" issue, a similar issue to CVE-2019-9498 and CVE-2019-9499.
On the Atlas
Every published CVE is on the CyberSIXT Atlas, grouped by weakness, vendor and month.
- Exploitation
- Possible (1 to 10%). EPSS between 1% and 10%.
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Public check
- No public nuclei template
- Published
- April 2019
CoverageNo articles yet
No CyberSIXT article names CVE-2019-11235 yet, so there is no coverage timeline, action brief or change log for it. Everything on this page comes from the public CVE record, CISA KEV, EPSS and the nuclei template index. Search the archive or see the CVEs in the news.
References
- NVD entrynvd.nist.gov
- CVE recordcve.org
- Weakness CWE-345cwe.mitre.org
- Vendor advisoryusn.ubuntu.com
- Vendor advisorylists.opensuse.org
- Vendor advisoryaccess.redhat.com
- Vendor advisoryaccess.redhat.com
- Vendor advisorylists.opensuse.org
- Vendor advisorylists.opensuse.org
- freeradius.org/release_notes/?br=3.0.x&re=3.0.19freeradius.org
- papers.mathyvanhoef.com/dragonblood.pdfpapers.mathyvanhoef.com
- kb.cert.org/vuls/id/871675kb.cert.org
- freeradius.org/securityfreeradius.org
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695748bugzilla.redhat.com