CVE-2019-17626
Vendor not named in the CVE record
Vendor fix available · Exploitation: possible (1 to 10%)
Not in CyberSIXT coverage yet: no article names this CVE. This page shows the public record.
Higher than 95% of scored CVEs
DescriptionCVE.org
ReportLab through 3.5.26 allows remote code execution because of toColor(eval(arg)) in colors.py, as demonstrated by a crafted XML document with '<span color="' followed by arbitrary Python code.
On the Atlas
Every published CVE is on the CyberSIXT Atlas, grouped by weakness, vendor and month.
- Exploitation
- Possible (1 to 10%). EPSS between 1% and 10%.
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Public check
- No public nuclei template
- Published
- October 2019
CoverageNo articles yet
No CyberSIXT article names CVE-2019-17626 yet, so there is no coverage timeline, action brief or change log for it. Everything on this page comes from the public CVE record, CISA KEV, EPSS and the nuclei template index. Search the archive or see the CVEs in the news.
References
- NVD entrynvd.nist.gov
- CVE recordcve.org
- Weakness CWE-91cwe.mitre.org
- Vendor advisoryaccess.redhat.com
- Vendor advisoryaccess.redhat.com
- Vendor advisorylists.fedoraproject.org
- Vendor advisoryaccess.redhat.com
- Vendor advisoryaccess.redhat.com
- Vendor advisorylists.fedoraproject.org
- Vendor advisorylists.opensuse.org
- Vendor advisoryusn.ubuntu.com
- Vendor advisorydebian.org
- Vendor advisorysecurity.gentoo.org
- bitbucket.org/rptlab/reportlab/issues/199/eval-in-colorspy-leadsbitbucket.org
- bitbucket.org/rptlab/reportlab/src/default/CHANGES.mdbitbucket.org
2 more references are in the CVE record.