CVE-2022-24903: Buffer overflow in TCP syslog server (receiver) components in rsyslog
Vendor fix available · Affected: rsyslog · Exploitation: possible (1 to 10%)
Not in CyberSIXT coverage yet: no article names this CVE. This page shows the public record.
Higher than 90% of scored CVEs
DescriptionCVE.org
Rsyslog is a rocket-fast system for log processing. Modules for TCP syslog reception have a potential heap buffer overflow when octet-counted framing is used. This can result in a segfault or some other malfunction. As of our understanding, this vulnerability can not be used for remote code execution. But there may still be a slight chance for experts to do that. The bug occurs when the octet count is read. While there is a check for the maximum number of octets, digits are written to a heap buffer even when the octet count is over the maximum, This can be used to overrun the memory buffer. However, once the sequence of digits stop, no additional characters can be added to the buffer. In our opinion, this makes remote exploits impossible or at least highly complex. Octet-counted framing is one of two potential framing modes. It is relatively uncommon, but enabled by default on receivers. Modules `imtcp`, `imptcp`, `imgssapi`, and `imhttp` are used for regular syslog message reception. It is best practice not to directly expose them to the public. When this practice is followed, the risk is considerably lower. Module `imdiag` is a diagnostics module primarily intended for testbench runs. We do not expect it to be present on any production installation. Octet-counted framing is not very common. Usually, it needs to be specifically enabled at senders. If users do not need it, they can turn it off for the most important modules. This will mitigate the vulnerability.
Affected products1
From the CVE record. A product or version that is not listed is unknown, not unaffected.
- rsyslog · rsyslog< 8.2204.1
On the Atlas
Every published CVE is on the CyberSIXT Atlas, grouped by weakness, vendor and month.
CoverageNo articles yet
No CyberSIXT article names CVE-2022-24903 yet, so there is no coverage timeline, action brief or change log for it. Everything on this page comes from the public CVE record, CISA KEV, EPSS and the nuclei template index. Search the archive or see the CVEs in the news.
References
- NVD entrynvd.nist.gov
- CVE recordcve.org
- Weakness CWE-120cwe.mitre.org
- Vendor advisorylists.fedoraproject.org
- Vendor advisorydebian.org
- github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/security/advisories/GHSA-ggw7-xr6h-mmgithub.com
- github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/commit/f211042ecbb472f9d8beb4678a65d2github.com
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221111-0002security.netapp.com
- Mailing listlists.debian.org