Skip to content
Sign in
CVE-2026-260776.5MediumCWE-287

CVE-2026-26077: Discourse doesn't ensure webhooks require a token

discourse

Affected: discourse · Exploitation: check available, not yet exploited

Not in CyberSIXT coverage yet: no article names this CVE. This page shows the public record.

0.9%probability of exploitation in the next 30 days
61st percentile
050100

Higher than 61% of scored CVEs

6.5MediumCVSS 3.1
LowMedium

DescriptionCVE.org

Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, several webhook endpoints (SendGrid, Mailjet, Mandrill, Postmark, SparkPost) in the `WebhooksController` accepted requests without a valid authentication token when no token was configured. This allowed unauthenticated attackers to forge webhook payloads and artificially inflate user bounce scores, potentially causing legitimate user emails to be disabled. The Mailpace endpoint had no token validation at all. Starting in versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, all webhook endpoints reject requests with a 406 response when no authentication token is configured. As a workaround, ensure that webhook authentication tokens are configured for all email provider integrations in site settings (e.g., `sendgrid_verification_key`, `mailjet_webhook_token`, `postmark_webhook_token`, `sparkpost_webhook_token`). There's no current workaround for mailpace before getting this fix.

Affected products1

From the CVE record. A product or version that is not listed is unknown, not unaffected.

  • discourse · discourse< 2025.12.2; >= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.1; >= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.0

On the Atlas

Every published CVE is on the CyberSIXT Atlas, grouped by weakness, vendor and month.

Open the Atlas
Exploitation
Check available, not yet exploited. A public nuclei template can confirm it on a system you are authorised to test.
CISA KEV
Not listed
Public check
Discourse - Unauthenticated Mailpace Webhook Bounce-Score Forgery · nuclei template in projectdiscovery/nuclei-templates
Vendor
discourse
Published
February 2026

CoverageNo articles yet

No CyberSIXT article names CVE-2026-26077 yet, so there is no coverage timeline, action brief or change log for it. Everything on this page comes from the public CVE record, CISA KEV, EPSS and the nuclei template index. Search the archive or see the CVEs in the news.

References

Updated AboutDevelopersSign in