CVE-2026-53175: inet: frags: fix use-after-free caused by the fqdir_pre_exit() flush
Vendor fix available · Affected: Linux · Exploitation: unlikely (under 1%)
Not in CyberSIXT coverage yet: no article names this CVE. This page shows the public record.
Higher than 24% of scored CVEs
DescriptionCVE.org
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: inet: frags: fix use-after-free caused by the fqdir_pre_exit() flush On netns teardown, fqdir_pre_exit() walks the fqdir rhashtable and flushes every fragment queue that is not yet complete using inet_frag_queue_flush(). That helper frees all the skbs queued on the fragment queue but does not set INET_FRAG_COMPLETE, and leaves q->fragments_tail and q->last_run_head pointing at the freed skbs. The queue itself stays in the rhashtable. fqdir_pre_exit() first lowers high_thresh to 0 to stop new queue lookups, but it cannot stop a fragment that already obtained the queue through inet_frag_find() earlier and stalled just before taking the queue lock. Once that fragment resumes after the flush and takes the queue lock, it passes the INET_FRAG_COMPLETE check and then dereferences the freed fragments_tail. inet_frag_queue_insert() reads FRAG_CB() and ->len of that pointer and, on the append path, writes ->next_frag, causing a slab use-after-free. IPv6, nf_conntrack_reasm6 and 6lowpan reassembly share the same flush path and are affected as well. Reset rb_fragments, fragments_tail and last_run_head in inet_frag_queue_flush() so a flushed queue no longer points at the freed skbs. A fragment that resumes after the flush and takes the queue lock then finds an empty queue and starts a new run instead of dereferencing the freed fragments_tail. ip_frag_reinit() already performed this reset after its own flush, so drop the now duplicate code there.
Affected products2
From the CVE record. A product or version that is not listed is unknown, not unaffected.
- Linux · Linuxfrom 6.12.93 before 6.12.94; from 6.18.3 before 6.18.36
- Linux · Linux6.19
On the Atlas
Every published CVE is on the CyberSIXT Atlas, grouped by weakness, vendor and month.
CoverageNo articles yet
No CyberSIXT article names CVE-2026-53175 yet, so there is no coverage timeline, action brief or change log for it. Everything on this page comes from the public CVE record, CISA KEV, EPSS and the nuclei template index. Search the archive or see the CVEs in the news.
References
- NVD entrynvd.nist.gov
- CVE recordcve.org
- Weakness CWE-825cwe.mitre.org
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/0e823ca0e7391630784ae7dd0981b7ad170a93d9git.kernel.org
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/c22599cc90e1cd5f8129c8670bd68a02ff7177b4git.kernel.org
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/89b909e9704587bfecc1aab1d37e98faee03b9f9git.kernel.org
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/010c3313a4d178dc2d3ce958d2e5cb055e2864c1git.kernel.org
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/32594b09854970d7ba83eb2dc8c69a2edd158c8egit.kernel.org
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53175access.redhat.com
- Issue trackerbugzilla.redhat.com
- security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-53175.security.access.redhat.com