CVE-2026-60922.1LowCWE-757

CVE-2026-6092: Encrypt-then-MAC could fall back to MAC-then-Encrypt when HAVE_ENCRYPT_THEN_MAC is configured

wolfSSL

Vendor fix available · Affected: wolfSSL · Exploitation: unlikely (under 1%)

Not in CyberSIXT coverage yet: no article names this CVE. This page shows the public record.

0.4%probability of exploitation in the next 30 days

32nd percentile

050100

Higher than 32% of scored CVEs

2.1LowCVSS 4.0

LowMediumHighCrit.

DescriptionCVE.org

When HAVE_ENCRYPT_THEN_MAC is configured, the implementation could fall back to MAC-then-Encrypt rather than enforcing Encrypt-then-MAC.

Affected products1

From the CVE record. A product or version that is not listed is unknown, not unaffected.

wolfSSL · wolfSSLfrom 5.2.0 up to and including 5.9.1

On the Atlas

Every published CVE is on the CyberSIXT Atlas, grouped by weakness, vendor and month.

Open the Atlas

Exploitation: Unlikely (under 1%). EPSS under 1%, or no score yet.
CISA KEV: Not listed
Public check: No public nuclei template
Weakness: Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation · Input Validation and Logic
Vendor: wolfSSL
Published: June 2026
Band: Unlikely (under 1%), June 2026

CoverageNo articles yet

No CyberSIXT article names CVE-2026-6092 yet, so there is no coverage timeline, action brief or change log for it. Everything on this page comes from the public CVE record, CISA KEV, EPSS and the nuclei template index. Search the archive or see the CVEs in the news.