Skip to content
Sign in
CVE-2026-95692Not scoredCWE-125

CVE-2026-95692

Vendor not yet named

No fix listed · Exploitation: not established

ExploitationNot established

Not in CISA KEV as of catalogue 2026.11.10 (10 Nov)

  1. In CISA KEV: not seen
  2. Exploited (reported): not seen
  3. Scanning observed: not seen
  4. Proof of concept public: not seen
  5. Not establishedNothing in the sources we check

No EPSS score yet. The score appears once FIRST publishes it.

Not scored yet. NVD has not published a CVSS score.

DescriptionNVD

Issue summary: Setting an AES-GCM-SIV IV shorter than the expected nonce length via EVP_CipherInit_ex() may trigger a heap out-of-bounds read. Supplying a longer IV is silently truncated instead of rejected. Impact summary: An application passing a caller-supplied IV of the wrong length may crash or read beyond its buffer. Because trailing IV bytes are ignored, an attacker who knows one message and tag may forge messages under a different IV. CWE: CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read Description: AES-GCM-SIV copies the caller-supplied IV or nonce into its internal state using a copy whose length is taken from the expected nonce size rather than from the length the caller actually provided. When the caller passes a shorter IV, the copy reads past the end of the caller's buffer; AddressSanitizer confirms a heap out-of-bounds read reached through EVP_CipherInit_ex() into ossl_aes_gcm_siv_init(). When the caller passes a longer IV, the implementation silently discards the trailing bytes instead of rejecting the length. The truncation breaks the binding between the IV and the computed authentication tag. An attacker who has observed a message and its tag under one IV can produce a message and tag that verify under a different IV whose first bytes match, since the surplus bytes never influence the computation. The message itself is unchanged, so this is a failure of IV commitment rather than a classic existential forgery. Only applications that call EVP_CipherInit_ex() (or the equivalent provider cipher initialization) with an IV length other than the standard 12 bytes for AES-GCM-SIV are affected. The severity is limited because the out-of-bounds read is small and attacker-controlled only in length, and the forgery requires an unusual IV length choice by the application. FIPS impact: no The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as AES-GCM-SIV is not an approved algorithm.

Coverage1 article · 1 outlet

First in our coverage: SecurityOnline, 10 Nov.

  1. OpenSSL details five low severity flaws across its products
    SecurityOnline · first in our coverage · mentions it in passing

New articles also arrive in the RSS feed.

References

Updated AboutDevelopersSign in