recorded together · two weakness classes

Cross-Site Request Forgery and Open Redirect

27 CVEs

27 CVEs name a weakness of both Cross-Site Request Forgery and Open Redirect, 1.9× what chance alone would give (about 14). The pairing most often behind it is CWE-352 (Cross-Site Request Forgery) with CWE-601 (Open Redirect), in 27 CVEs.

Every dot is a CVE whose record names a weakness from both classes, neither being the other's parent in the CWE hierarchy. The named ones come first: exploited in the wild, then those with a public check, then the likeliest to be.

Connect AI

Cross-Site Request ForgeryCSRF

Open RedirectREDIR

CVEs that carry a weakness of both: 27
Chance alone would give: about 14
So they are recorded together: 1.9× more often than chance

ExportCSV Markdown

A CVE counts when its record names a weakness from each class, neither being the other's parent. It says the two kinds of flaw are recorded together in one vulnerability more or less often than chance: not that one causes the other, and it follows how the people who file CVEs choose CWEs.

How this is weighed, and the sources

Chance is what the two classes' shares of all CVEs that carry weaknesses of two or more classes would give if weaknesses paired at random. A line is drawn on the dial from 25 CVEs and 1.15 times chance. Weaknesses are the CWEs the CVE List and NVD record; exploitation is CISA KEV, likelihood is EPSS.

Every one of the 27 is a mark on the map. Named now: 1 to 26, most at risk first.

exploited in the wildcheck availableringed, named or not: CyberSIXT has reported on it

Zoom in on the map and the dots under the middle of it are named where they are.

Data as of 2026-11-15. CVE List through 2026-11-15 · EPSS of 2026-11-14 · CISA KEV checked 2026-11-15. Sources: the CVE List, CISA KEV, EPSS, NVD, nuclei templates and public bug bounty data.