Skip to content

CWE-129 · weakness in Memory Corruption

Improper Validation of Array Index

648 CVEs · 1 exploited

Every dot is a CVE; the named ones are the most at risk. Red is exploited in the wild.

exploited in the wild
1
likely to be exploited
7

Every one of the 648 is a mark on the map. Named now: 1 to 26, most at risk first.

  1. The issue was addressed with improved bounds checks. This issue is fixed in tvOS 15.6, watchOS 8.7, iOS 15.6 and iPadOS 15.6, macOS Monterey 12.5, Safari 15.6. Processing web cont…CVE-2022-48503Apple · CVSS 8.8 · 3.2% likelycovered by CyberSIXT

    Apple

  2. Vulnerability in the MySQL Cluster product of Oracle MySQL (component: Cluster: General). Supported versions that are affected are 7.5.23 and prior, 7.6.19 and prior and 8.0.26 an…CVE-2021-35592Oracle Corporation · CVSS 6.3 · 52% likely

    Oracle

  3. Vulnerability in the MySQL Cluster product of Oracle MySQL (component: Cluster: General). Supported versions that are affected are 7.4.33 and prior, 7.5.23 and prior, 7.6.19 and p…CVE-2021-35598Oracle Corporation · CVSS 6.3 · 51% likely

    Oracle

  4. Vulnerability in the MySQL Cluster product of Oracle MySQL (component: Cluster: General). Supported versions that are affected are 7.4.33 and prior, 7.5.23 and prior, 7.6.19 and p…CVE-2021-35594Oracle Corporation · CVSS 6.3 · 51% likely

    Oracle

  5. SQLite 1.0.12 through 3.39.x before 3.39.2 sometimes allows an array-bounds overflow if billions of bytes are used in a string argument to a C API.CVE-2022-35737Sqlite · CVSS 7.5 · 24% likely

    Sqlite

  6. Array index error in win32k.sys in the kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, W…CVE-2014-6317Microsoft · 18% likely

    Microsoft

  7. The affected products are vulnerable to an improper validation of array index, which could allow an attacker to crash the server and remotely execute arbitrary code.CVE-2023-0755PTC · CVSS 9.8 · 12% likely

    PTC

  8. RARLAB WinRAR Recovery Volume Improper Validation of Array Index Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityCVE-2023-40477RARLAB · CVSS 7.8 · 10% likely

    Rarlab

  9. The NFSv4 server in the Linux kernel before 4.11.3 does not properly validate the layout type when processing the NFSv4 pNFS GETDEVICEINFO or LAYOUTGET operand in a UDP packet fro…CVE-2017-8797Linux · 9.5% likely

    Linux

  10. An issue was discovered in Adobe Acrobat and Reader: 2017.012.20098 and earlier versions, 2017.011.30066 and earlier versions, 2015.006.30355 and earlier versions, and 11.0.22 and…CVE-2017-16410Adobe · 8.5% likely

    Adobe

  11. Array index error in the scanstring function in the _json module in Python 2.7 through 3.5 and simplejson before 2.6.1 allows context-dependent attackers to read arbitrary process…CVE-2014-4616Python · 7.8% likely

    Python1 bounty report

  12. An exploitable out-of-bounds indexing vulnerability exists within the RW fabric message particle type of Aerospike Database Server 3.10.0.3. A specially crafted packet can cause t…CVE-2016-9053Aerospike · CVSS 9.8 · 7.2% likely

    Aerospike

  13. An issue was discovered in Adobe Acrobat and Reader: 2017.012.20098 and earlier versions, 2017.011.30066 and earlier versions, 2015.006.30355 and earlier versions, and 11.0.22 and…CVE-2017-16391Adobe · 6.7% likely

    Adobe

  14. Microsoft Office Visio Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityCVE-2021-38654Microsoft · CVSS 7.8 · 6.4% likely

    Microsoft

  15. Array index error in the t42_parse_sfnts function in type42/t42parse.c in FreeType before 2.4.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibl…CVE-2010-2806Freetype · 5.8% likely

    Freetype

  16. Jet Database Engine Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityCVE-2019-0906Microsoft · CVSS 7.8 · 5.7% likely

    Microsoft

  17. Array index error in smal_decode_segment function in LibRaw before 0.17.1 allows context-dependent attackers to cause memory errors and possibly execute arbitrary code via vectors…CVE-2015-8366Libraw · 5.1% likely

    Libraw

  18. The GetBlockHeadersMsg handler in the LES protocol implementation in Go Ethereum (aka geth) before 1.8.11 may lead to an access violation because of an integer signedness error fo…CVE-2018-12018Ethereum · 4.2% likely

    Ethereum

  19. Integer signedness error in rfc2231_get_param from strings.c in PINE before 4.58 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an email that causes an out-of-bounds array…CVE-2003-0721Washington · 4.0% likely
  20. An array index error in MikroTik RouterOS 6.41.3 through 6.46.5, and 7.x through 7.0 Beta5, allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the SMB server via modified setup-re…CVE-2020-11881Mikrotik · 3.8% likely

    Mikrotik

  21. An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader before 9.1 and PhantomPDF before 9.1. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. User interaction is required to…CVE-2018-7406Foxitsoftware · 3.7% likely

    Foxitsoftware

  22. Armagetron 0.2.6.0 and earlier and Armagetron Advanced 0.2.7.0 earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a packet with a large (1) descr…CVE-2005-0369Armagetronad · CVSS 5.3 · 3.5% likely
  23. An issue was discovered in GoGo Protobuf before 1.3.2. plugin/unmarshal/unmarshal.go lacks certain index validation, aka the "skippy peanut butter" issue.CVE-2021-3121Golang · 3.4% likely

    Golang

  24. A code execution vulnerability exists in the Nef polygon-parsing functionality of CGAL libcgal CGAL-5.1.1 in Nef_S2/SNC_io_parser.h SNC_io_parser::read_sface() sfh->volume() OOB r…CVE-2020-35636Cgal · CVSS 10 · 3.4% likely

    CGAL Project

  25. Buffer overflows were discovered in the CoAP library in Arm Mbed OS 5.14.0. The CoAP parser is responsible for parsing received CoAP packets. The function sn_coap_parser_options_p…CVE-2019-17212Mbed · 3.1% likely

    Mbed

  26. A code execution vulnerability exists in the Nef polygon-parsing functionality of CGAL libcgal CGAL-5.1.1. An oob read vulnerability exists in Nef_2/PM_io_parser.h PM_io_parser::r…CVE-2020-28601Cgal · CVSS 10 · 3.0% likely

    CGAL Project

exploited in the wildcheck availableringed, named or not: CyberSIXT has reported on it

Zoom in on the map and the dots under the middle of it are named where they are.

Data as of 2026-11-15. CVE List through 2026-11-15 · EPSS of 2026-11-14 · CISA KEV checked 2026-11-15. Sources: the CVE List, CISA KEV, EPSS, NVD, nuclei templates and public bug bounty data.